LETTER: Beware the slippery slope on agricultural land

Editor Kings County Advertiser and Register
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

It was good to see that Kings County municipal council has included the protection of agricultural land in the terms of reference in studying the business case for the relocation of the municipal airport. (Kings County Register, June 12, “County approves airport business case study terms of reference”). Of concern, however, are the reported comments of one councillor who “won’t be deeply opposed to the use of agricultural land” and that “compromises might have to be made.”

In this direction is a slippery slope that could lead to agricultural land being sacrificed for any economic purpose. If airport type businesses are permitted on farmland, why not golf courses, subdivisions, anything at all?

Let us hope our community is not plunged once again into this divisive argument and that our municipal council and provincial government remain committed to the preservation of our most valuable, necessary, and enduring resource: our farmland.

Tom Cosman

Greenwich

Organizations: Kings County Register

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Janet Daye
    June 20, 2014 - 12:16

    Is it not Councillor Raven you are talking about? John Ross, it must be miserable to be you, you have nothing constructive to say - ever!

  • john ross
    June 19, 2014 - 19:02

    In other words....be very watchful of council trying to get that greasy,slippery bureaucratic lingo in there. Just getting their foot in the doorway will spell doom for Valley agriculture