• The Register/Advertiser
  • The Vanguard
  • The Sou'Wester
  • The Digby Courier
  • The Coastguard
  • The Advance
  • The Hants Journal
  • The Spectator
  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

PAC recommendation has a rough ride

 Leland Anthony, councillor for the Chebogue district, responded angrily when Torey Grimshaw questioned his silence during the first part of the meeting. Carla Allen photo

Leland Anthony, councillor for the Chebogue district, responded angrily when Torey Grimshaw questioned his silence during the first part of the meeting.Carla Allen photo

Carla Allen
Published on November 14, 2012
Published on November 14, 2012
Carla Allen  RSS Feed
The Vanguard

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

Council members for the Municipality of Yarmouth found themselves in the hot seats Monday night during an information meeting at Arcadia School.

Topics :
Planning Advisory Committee , Red Ocean , Utility and Review Board of Nova Scotia , Blueberry Hill , Chebogue River , Argyle

A decision by the municipality’s Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) in July to recommend to council that regulations be amended to allow aquaculture operations in rural industrial zones (with environmental concerns addressed) was questioned by many residents.

The change would be one of several legislative adjustments necessary for the establishment of an eel production facility on Blueberry Hill in Chebogue by Jason Lee of Red Ocean Inc.

Residents expressed anger at the possible pollution of the scenic and historically-rich Chebogue River.

The proposed site is in a rural development zone so a rezoning application would also have to be submitted. That process would also require public hearings.

Inland aquaculture is presently only allowed in a marine industrial zone.

“How can you make a recommendation to council to approve something that you don’t even understand yourself,” asked Torey Grimshaw.

“That committee should go back to the table, understand what’s going on and then make informed judgment,” she said to applause.

Councillor Leland Anthony turned the lack of information back on the audience when asked for his opinion on the matter.

“You guys want to kill it before you even have the information,” he said.

A public participation meeting on the issue was held on Oct. 16. Grimshaw pointed out the innocuous nature of the advertisement announcing the meeting.

“It says nothing about the actual industry. If you were to read this you’d think, what the hell are they talking about?”

People questioned the net benefit of the

proposed development, with some speakers saying it would be highly mechanized. There was scorn expressed regarding district planner Brad Fulton’s description of the province’s aquaculture industry creating an estimated 750 direct and 1,000 indirect jobs annually.

Dianne Crowell owned and operated an eel processing plant in Argyle for close to 20 years.

She said there was no research based on Fulton’s recommendation.

Her business is for sale and is located on the Argyle River because it needs brackish water for its processing plant.

“You could probably get it for taxes at this point,” she said to laughter.

“He hasn’t gone into any research about what inland aquaculture means, where the waste goes for that.

“I’m going to be very frank with you, this is a way to get a licence to process elvers,” she said.

Elvers are baby eels born in the Sargasso Sea. It takes them a year and a half of swimming to arrive in this region. They are sometimes called glass eels because of their transparency.

Crowell said they command huge prices in today’s market.

“There are about 2,000 elvers in a kilo and presently they are getting thousands of dollars for a kilo. In Korea they are grown through aquaculture. In some countries they are the most expensive appetizer you’ll ever entertain, way more expensive than caviar,” she said.

Council will debate the PAC motion on Nov. 28 and will either pass, change or reject it. The item may also be returned to the PAC with a request for a different proposal related to the issue.

Should council approve the motion by the PAC, a public hearing must be held, with two weeks notice given of the upcoming meeting. 

The change allowing aquaculture operations in an RI zone would affect all of the RI zones in the municipality.

If residents do not agree with the decision, they can apply to the Utility and Review Board of Nova Scotia to challenge it.

A new development would also be subject to developmental agreements.

Despite these hurdles, many residents expressed concern that the PAC was advancing the progress of the proposal with little information about the proposed business.

 

 

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    John Halley Horton
    - November 21, 2012 at 08:12:33

    What they really need is a license to withdraw huge volumes of clean water , with political assurances that they will be 'protected ' against pollution charges when they return their fouled water back to nature. You know, like a mink farm.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John Sollows
    - November 16, 2012 at 09:29:16

    I was there and acted as self-appointed note-taker. My read on the drama is that in any case like this, there are three sides, your side, my side, and the right side. Respectful sympathies to all involved in the hope that we all learn from it. Re. the earlier comment about our being anti-business: There is nothing wrong with arguing for SUSTAINABLE businesses. The other kind tends to leave us worse off than we already are. My verdict on the operation in question is still out.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Roger Smith
    - November 15, 2012 at 08:10:44

    To those opposed to the project why not just buy the land then everybody is happy except Me Lee.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    A. Sherman
    - November 14, 2012 at 20:53:44

    Yarmouth and area must be the most anti-business place in Canada. Is there not another article on the very site that states that the local unemployment rate is the highest in two decades at 13.5%? It's no wonder. People here have no one to blame but themselves and their attitude toward progress. Those same attitudes are killing the lobster fishery as we speak, which is the last major industry in this area.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Carol
      - November 16, 2012 at 10:24:53

      We are not opposed to new industy coming in,we welcome jobs when they are so badly needed.We do oppose the area where they are considering putting this .It is on the Chebogue River and no one seems to know what damage can be done.This river is pristeen and we would like to keep it this way.What damage would this do to the claming beds as well as the lobster.This business will create a very few jobs and could very well cause the lost of other jobs.As well as it will be in the middle of a residential area and across from a seniors redident and I am sure they do not want to hear motors running day and night not to mention the traffic.As it was said this business can be run in an industrial park and this would be the place to put it.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising