Federal Liberal leader, Stephané Dion (middle) attended a fundraiser at White Point Beach Resort in Queens County Sept. 28. He also toured the riding with South Shore St. Margaret’s Liberal candidate, Dr. Bill Smith. Shown, also enjoying a laugh is Cherry Hill resident and Queens County Liberal Association immediate past president, Margaret Campbell. Mark Roberts Photo
Economy linked to social justice - Liberals
Stephané Dion visits Queens County
Federal Liberal leader, Stephané Dion celebrated his 52nd birthday in Liverpool Sept. 28 by lashing out at the Conservative minority government for its lack of integrity.
He also said the federal Conservatives need to realize there is a direct link between “social justice” issues, environmental sustainability and economic prosperity.
Dion attended a Liberal fundraiser at White Point Beach Resort after spending the day touring the riding with South Shore St. Margaret’s Liberal candidate, Dr. Bill Smith. The packed fundraiser was attended by MLAs and MPs from across the province.
Dr. Smith, while introducing Dion, used a common phrase about the weather to describe area MP Gerald Keddy’s position on the Atlantic Accord.
“I have not seen the weather change as often as Mr. Keddy has on the Atlantic Accord.” He said Keddy has lost his “credibility” as a result.
Dion added during his speech, “The main thing I hear from people is they want a Prime Minister they can trust. The relationship of trust has been broken.”
Dr. Smith said Dion is unlike Keddy and Prime Minister Stephen Harper in that he would honour the Atlantic Accord, Canada’s environmental commitments and universal programs like childcare.
“I’ve come to have a deep respect for your integrity, intelligence and for your vision. Having said that sir, do you realize you’re a lot like me?” The crowd burst into laughter.
“That might not be readily obvious to you or to anyone in this room,” he added with a smile.
Dion said, after spending the day with Dr. Smith, the candidate has an excellent ability “to read the people, to understand their problems.”
He said educating people to give them the skills they need to work, helping provide childcare, promoting good early childhood development, and helping Canadians through reducing poverty by “sharing the wealth,” will also grow the economy.
He said the Conservatives see “social programs as a burden on the economy.”
He chastised the Harper government for replacing the Liberal childcare plan with some money that isn’t helping those who need it.
“It’s all an investment in the future to ensure the children will have the potential to be successful in life.”
He said Canada could also benefit economically from the immediate need to reduce pollution and curb global warming because of the country’s ability to create and export technology and expertise.
He explained Canada must do its part to curb greenhouse gas emissions but can help other countries do so as well because it is a global problem.
He said environmental sustainability is now linked with economic growth and social justice issues but that Prime Minister Harper won’t make the “difficult decisions that must be made.
“They won’t be made unless you have fire in your eyes when you say it. I do not believe him. He will delay action. He will pretend. He will spend a lot of money on spin-doctoring but I need the real doctor.”
The crowd laughed as the Dr. Smith joke came out of no-where.
Beverley Smith
Comment online since September 30th 2007Here's the thing- I agree with Dion in principle but his suggested practice will not achieve the goal. The principle that we're all in this together, that we each benefit by helping the other is clear. I believe in eradicating child poverty, in ensuring all small children are given the best loving and educationally supportive environment possible in any nation and that women deserve full rights to equality whatever their career path. But and here is the big but, Dion is thinking with male blinders on. He thinks that all women only want to earn and that the liberation is to help them escape taking care of the kids so they can earn. In fact many women view liberation as being able to take care of the kids. To eradicate child poverty the route to pushing all women to earn is a short-term solution whereby yes more money would flow into the house but then would flow right out again with high taxes to support a national daycare system that, for every preschooler at $10,000 a space would itself cost $20 billion per year. And if we really want to give top of the line early education to children we should ensure they get one-on-one loving attentive care that notices their idiosyncracies, plans activitives based on their interests and skills and does not lock-step put them into groups where they are forced and assumed to all progress at the same rate. In other words, for full liberation of women, for a real end to child poverty and for optimal early education we do need to fund social policy- but it should be through tax reduction for households so they could make up their own minds about how to live. Income splitting, universal birth benefit, universal child benefit that flows with the child, pension benefits for the caregiving years.All these suggestions would accomplish the DIon goals - and his means will not.