Should have used proper process

Dear Editor:



That there is still a dispute over the Sunday shopping issue is putting it mildly. Some did not accept the results of the plebiscite. Others do not accept the reversal. In either case, each side has legitimate reasons for questioning the processes used to address the issue.

The Yes side did not accept how government went about the plebiscite. The No side did not accept the alternative method the government used in reversing the plebiscite decision. It also appears that neither side is particularly happy about courts making the decision.

One process was from the bottom up. The other from the top down. The third is simply an attempt to try and correct the failure of the other two.

What are the attributes of a proper dispute resolution process?

It must be fair. It must allow all points to be aired. It must allow enough time for all of those involved to exchange their views. It must be structured to make all that happen. Most importantly all parties must agree that the process is fair. If any of the others is missing then it isn't.

In this case all points did not reach the general population for two reasons. One was that the structure was inadequate to provide the forums necessary. Two was that not enough time was allowed for them to get into general circulation. We know this because new points are being raised every day.

In order for a dispute to be deemed settled, both sides must recognize that fact. Obviously one side won't like it but they will understand why. The only way that is possible is if both sides agree the process is valid. In other words, they may not like the decision but if the process is fair then they will accept the decision and can move on.

If either the top down or the bottom up method is used it must satisfy the attributes mentioned. So it is just a matter of practicality as to which method is used. Some feel that the top down method is the only way but if widespread discussion is needed then probably the second method is more practical. In either instance the government still has to assume the role of coordinator.

Why don't we get a proper process in place so that we can make sure the next time there is a plebiscite that it will settle the issue rather than allow it to drag on way longer than it should. As for this dispute it goes way past Sunday and it still needs settling.



Ron Fraser

Kingston