Community values are critical

To the Editor:

In the arguments surrounding the Digby quarry dispute, frequently “core community values” are discussed in opposition to sound science (e.g., “Bilcon seeking damages”, Chronicle-Herald, Feb. 5, 2008).

An example is the claim by NAFTA apologist Barry Appleton, who charges the Fournier (review) panel “included novel, non-scientific criteria” in its advice to the government to reject the quarry project.

First, there should be nothing novel about the inclusion of community values. It is well recognized in development theory and action any change process that bypasses community members in the planning stage and then fails to consider and address community wishes is doomed. Local residents should be consulted and included at every stage in the decisions that directly involve their lives and futures.

Second, the definition of “science” has changed profoundly to include, in addition to facts about animate and inanimate objects, values held by humans. The very foundation of science, once considered to be its “objectivity,” now includes a recognition that subjectively held human values are deeply embedded in all research. This is evident, for instance, in the questions asked by scientists, and those avoided.

If community input violates NAFTA, it is time we reconsider the value of this international trade deal.

Carol E. Harris

Wolfville