Updated: Raven, Kings County both seeking costs in municipal legal fight

Jennifer
Jennifer Hoegg
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Pauline Raven may have dropped her lawsuit against Kings County, but the municipal legal battle isn’t over yet.

In a press release this morning, Warden Diana Brothers said she is pleased the councillor for District 3 has dropped the case, but disappointed Raven is seeking costs from the county.

Raven confirmed she is seeking $400 in costs from the county.

“I think it’s time to move on,” Brother said. 

However, she confirmed the municipality will contest the request and seek their own costs against her.

Brothers’ statement says a letter was filed with the court Jan. 23 by Raven’s lawyer withdrawing her application for Judicial Review by the Supreme Court, but requesting her legal costs be covered by the municipality.

Raven launched the application in October, after Brothers gave her a warning about language used during a debate over a request for a regional government study.  She challenged the county over whether it was an appropriate use of the code of conduct policy; the county contends it was not a code of conduct matter, but a point of order. Earlier this month, Judge Pierre Muise agreed it was a point of order and not subject to judicial review.

“The warning issued to Councillor Raven was a result of her breaching the rules of order by using offensive and inappropriate language,” Brothers said. “I’m pleased that Justice Muise confirmed the duty of the chair to maintain decorum and the authority to issue warnings to councillors.”

 “Council’s subsequent decision to endorse the warning was never intended to be regarded as a decision under the code of conduct,” said Brothers. “In order to avoid any confusion or uncertainty on that point, on January 21, 2014, council chose to rescind the motion of October 15, 2013. It’s important to note that the warning to Councillor Raven for her comments still stands.”

Raven said Jan. 24 the decision to rescind the Oct. 15 vote was "at the core" of her decision to end the suit. 

"It’s clear that this code of conduct matter is now struck from the municipal record and there’s no point in asking the court to look further into the issue,"  Raven said. "It has been resolved to my satisfaction. I’m ready to get back to regular business and better governance."

No information is available yet on when the application for costs by the parties will be considered by the court.

For full coverage of the case, click here.

For Brothers' full statement, see page 2.

Organizations: Supreme Court, Kings County Warden Diana Brothers, Council Chambers

Geographic location: Kings

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Sean K
    January 24, 2014 - 16:58

    I agree with both of the below comments.

  • D3 needs help
    January 24, 2014 - 16:27

    Councillor Raven, you are clearly not cut out for the job of municipal councillor. Resign your seat, let the people of District 3 have the chance to have a Councillor who has our interests at heart, or at least has them on their radar. You are more interested in your personals agendas and battles and wasting taxpayers money on these agendas and battles than you will ever be in the issues of District 3 and the county overall. Dick Killam had the interests of D3 as his priority. Lets have a snap election and get Dick back in the chair.

  • Cory Waye
    January 24, 2014 - 13:52

    You are doing an excellent job Warden Brothers! Keep up the good work! Your leadership is what this county need! Thank-you!