• The Register/Advertiser
  • The Vanguard
  • The Sou'Wester
  • The Digby Courier
  • The Coastguard
  • The Advance
  • The Hants Journal
  • The Spectator

Province should ban use of bio-solids as fertilizer



Published on January 9th, 2009
Published on January 30th, 2010
 

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

Letter to The Advertiser

Topics :
Federation of Agriculture , North American , Nova Scotia , Nova Scotians

To the Editor:

The President of the Federation of Agriculture stated recently that they hope to implement a program to "help farmers" by providing them with free bio-solid sewage sludge from HRM to use on their farm fields.

The problem is this practice of using "treated" human waste as fertilizer has never been proven to be safe beyond reasonable doubts. In fact, the practice has been banned in some provinces or a ban is pending in others because of severe health and environmental concerns.

How ironic it is that our government is set to spend $2.3 million to help promote the Buy Local initiative in Nova Scotia yet will sit back and allow bio-solid sewage matter to be spread over our most valuable resource - the land that feeds us - and risk compromising consumer confidence in the safety of locally-produced foods.

Is it wise to risk pitting consumer against farmer at the time when many Nova Scotians are beginning to realize the importance of supporting local food growers and to believe that foods produced in Nova Scotia may be considerably safer than foods from elsewhere?

What is most bothersome to me is, as a consumer, I am not being informed of who is utilizing bio-solids on their farm fields and who is not. In many instances, consumers are not able to make informed decisions about the food products they buy and feed their families with because pertinent information is missing from labels.

Our farmers need real solutions, not more problems. Providing free "toxic" fertilizer is not an answer for our farmers even if it helps defray costs. It is an answer to how HRM and other municipalities will dispose of its sewage material that has nowhere else to go.

In many North American areas where bio-solid usage has been ongoing, numerous environmental and medical experts have been proclaiming that many of the components in sewage sludge - such as feces, urine, blood, vomit, personal care products, synthetic hormones, pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, bacteria, viruses, prions, parasites, solvents, detergents, pesticides, heavy metals, and flame retardants - are accumulating in our soils and will persist there for years and years to come.

In this "toxic stew", testing is done primarily for E. Coli bacteria and the heavy metals (arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury). Most other chemicals can't be tested for due to limitations on labs, many of which have no methodology and no benchmarks to say what is safe and what isn’t. "Treatment" of sewage doesn't kill all pathogens. Nova Scotians already suffer an above-average cancer rate. Will this practice worsen our health outlook?

I would like to see Nova Scotia ban the use of bio-solids on our agricultural land and laws be passed that make it mandatory for any farmer outside of the province using bio-solid fertilizer to state the fact on their consumer information labels.

Marilyn Cameron

Greenwich, Kings County

Comments

  • Username
    Todd Yeadon
    - August 21st, 2010 at 21:52:45

    If it is not safe, then explain this from CFIA: "All fertilizers or supplements sold in or imported into Canada, are regulated under the federal Fertilizers Act administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The Fertilizers Act stipulates that all regulated products must be safe with respect to human, plant, animal health and the environment, efficacious for the intended purpose and properly labelled to avoid misrepresentation in the marketplace and fraud. Compliance and enforcement efforts under the Fertilizer Act are carried out by officers from the CFIA and the Canadian Border Services Agency. Compliance efforts are focused on verifying that products meet label guarantees and satisfy the safety standards for biological and chemical contaminants (pathogens, heavy metals, pesticide residues, etc.). Producers found to be non-compliant are subject to regulatory action, which may include product detention (stop sale) and, in severe cases, prosecution. "

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Nova News Now is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising