• The Register/Advertiser
  • The Vanguard
  • The Sou'Wester
  • The Digby Courier
  • The Coastguard
  • The Advance
  • The Hants Journal
  • The Spectator
  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (0)

When Matthews build it, they will come

Published on May 7, 2001
Ottawa Business Journal
Published on January 19, 2011

When Terry Matthews throws a coming out party, it's a command performance.

Topics :
Mitel , Bell , AT& T Canada. He works in Toronto, but goes home to Cape Breton on weekends. Toronto is a good place to work, but you wouldn't want to live there. John MacDonald, another scion of Cape Breton, who succeeded MacDonald as president of Bell, and now runs Leitch Technology Corp. in Toronto, comes home on weekends to Ottawa. Terry's festivity last week was disguised as a conference called NetVideoWorld, and perhaps half of the hundreds of people there were genuinely interested in whether net-video is for real or a variant of the dot-com sinkholes, popularly known today as dot-bombs. With Alcatel, Nortel, JDS and other big optical networking boys located here, there is a fast-growing cluster of net-video wannabes growing as well. The other half were there to find out what Terry is up to as he combines March Networks, which he started when he owned Newbridge, with Mitel Networks, which he started a quarter century ago with Mike Cowpland, then sold and has just reacquired it with the bundle he got for selling Newbridge. It takes some figuring out, but the short of it is that March-Mitel is into net-video. The argument for net-video goes like this: billions of dollars have been invested in broadband, the huge electronic/photonics transmission pipes that can deliver megas and gigas and terras of whatever you can think of to fill them with. Capacity is unrestrained, much exceeding the voice, data, net messaging and even TV pictures that currently flow through it. The consequence is that costs and prices are plummeting, new entrants to the field are cratering and even the Ma Bell-type monopolies are seeing their once guaranteed returns much diminished. What to do? The net-video argument that Terry puts is that "video is a bandwidth hog." The more moving pictures sent over the infoway and the more interactivity that can be stimulated as in, "I like those pictures, send me more and here are some of mine" the faster the profits will flow. Who needs all these pictures? How much are they willing to pay for them? I ask myself these questions and the answers come. Not me. Not much. But it's not me the net-video crowd is after, and maybe not you either, unless you're a CEO, in which case, get back to work and stop spending your precious attention on matters columnystical. Entertainment and other consumer applications, such as scanning retail shelves and ordering over distances, are not where net-video will make inroads. Consumer habits are hard to change. Consumers are fickle. And they're price conscious (cheap even). At least initially, net-video killer apps are most likely to emerge in a business context. Business is willing to look at ways to save money or make more (which are the same thing) and will pay a good dollar to do it. This is not to say that business is an easy sell or that good ideas abound about how net-video can be used. A lot of hope is invested in network video's potential to reduce travel budgets and travel time by delivering teleconferences and pictures over distance. Savings, goes the argument of fervent evangelists, will flow partly to net-video and partly to the bottom line of the business employing it. But as an early innovator of teleconferencing and one who has experienced it from time to time over two decades, I caution true believers that there's a generation or two still alive that is heavily prejudiced against a technology that promises much but delivers frustration. "Business content means relevant information and knowledge," McLennan told Terry's gathering. "To devise real business solutions using voice, video and data we have to get right into the customers' premises in order to recognize needs and then manage those needs in a way that provides real value. "But it's not going to settle down in the next three to five years. You shouldn't be in this business if you don't have deep pockets and you're not comfortable managing change." Terry Matthews smiles. Tony Patterson, founding editor of Silicon Valley NORTH and formerly associate editor of Financial Times of Canada , Ottawa

Everyone in town comes, and many from elsewhere, and it's an old friends

gathering where, as John McLennan says, "you keep encountering people you've

worked with not just once, but two or three times before."

John is ex-Mitel, ex-Rogers, ex-Bell employee and now president of AT& T Canada.

He works in Toronto, but goes home to Cape Breton on weekends. Toronto is a

good place to work, but you wouldn't want to live there. John MacDonald, another

scion of Cape Breton, who succeeded MacDonald as president of Bell, and now

runs Leitch Technology Corp. in Toronto, comes home on weekends to Ottawa.

Terry's festivity last week was disguised as a conference called NetVideoWorld,

and perhaps half of the hundreds of people there were genuinely interested in

whether net-video is for real or a variant of the dot-com sinkholes, popularly known

today as dot-bombs. With Alcatel, Nortel, JDS and other big optical networking boys

located here, there is a fast-growing cluster of net-video wannabes growing as

well.

The other half were there to find out what Terry is up to as he combines March

Networks, which he started when he owned Newbridge, with Mitel Networks, which

he started a quarter century ago with Mike Cowpland, then sold and has just

reacquired it with the bundle he got for selling Newbridge. It takes some figuring

out, but the short of it is that March-Mitel is into net-video.

The argument for net-video goes like this: billions of dollars have been invested in

broadband, the huge electronic/photonics transmission pipes that can deliver

megas and gigas and terras of whatever you can think of to fill them with. Capacity

is unrestrained, much exceeding the voice, data, net messaging and even TV

pictures that currently flow through it. The consequence is that costs and prices are

plummeting, new entrants to the field are cratering and even the Ma Bell-type

monopolies are seeing their once guaranteed returns much diminished.

What to do? The net-video argument that Terry puts is that "video is a bandwidth

hog." The more moving pictures sent over the infoway and the more interactivity that

can be stimulated as in, "I like those pictures, send me more and here are some

of mine" the faster the profits will flow.

Who needs all these pictures? How much are they willing to pay for them? I ask

myself these questions and the answers come. Not me. Not much.

But it's not me the net-video crowd is after, and maybe not you either, unless you're

a CEO, in which case, get back to work and stop spending your precious attention

on matters columnystical.

Entertainment and other consumer applications, such as scanning retail shelves

and ordering over distances, are not where net-video will make inroads. Consumer

habits are hard to change. Consumers are fickle. And they're price conscious

(cheap even).

At least initially, net-video killer apps are most likely to emerge in a business

context. Business is willing to look at ways to save money or make more (which are

the same thing) and will pay a good dollar to do it. This is not to say that business

is an easy sell or that good ideas abound about how net-video can be used.

A lot of hope is invested in network video's potential to reduce travel budgets and

travel time by delivering teleconferences and pictures over distance. Savings, goes

the argument of fervent evangelists, will flow partly to net-video and partly to the

bottom line of the business employing it. But as an early innovator of

teleconferencing and one who has experienced it from time to time over two

decades, I caution true believers that there's a generation or two still alive that is

heavily prejudiced against a technology that promises much but delivers

frustration.

"Business content means relevant information and knowledge," McLennan told

Terry's gathering. "To devise real business solutions using voice, video and data

we have to get right into the customers' premises in order to recognize needs and

then manage those needs in a way that provides real value.

"But it's not going to settle down in the next three to five years. You shouldn't be in

this business if you don't have deep pockets and you're not comfortable managing

change."

Terry Matthews smiles.

Tony Patterson, founding editor of Silicon Valley NORTH and formerly associate

editor of Financial Times of Canada, is a regular columnist for the Ottawa

Business Journal. He can be reached at tonyp@newvid.ca.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Nova News Now is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising